Single judge order issuing notice in a writ petition regarding educational matters. Service is waived for some respondents while the petitioner must serve others personally or via Speed Post/e-mail/Fax by a specified date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 944-2012
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 944 OF 2012
Rizwan Hawaldar Khan
...Petitioner
vs. The Dy.Director of Education, Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sunil D. Dighe for the Petitioner. Ms.Anjali Helekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 8. Mr.Ashish Rao i/b. M/s.M. & M. Legal Ventures for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ.
MAY 7, 2012
P.C. :-
Issue notice to respondents returnable on 28th June, 2012 Ms.Anjali
Helekar, learned AGP waives service for respondent nos.2 and 8 and Mr.Ashish Rao waives service for respondent nos.3 to 5.
In addition, the petitioner to serve the rest of the respondents by Advocate’s notice either personally or by Speed Post / e-mail / Fax, and file affidavit of service on or before 15th June, 2012, failing which the petition to stand dismissed qua the unserved respondents for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
Rizwan Hawaldar Khan
The Dy. Director of Education, Mumbai & Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
