An applicant filed an application for amendment of writ petition. The court held that the proposed amendment did not alter the nature of the petition. The application for amendment was allowed.
Amendment of writ petition allowed within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw2444-12.order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Civil Application W No. 2444 of 2012 in Writ Petition No. 5168 of 2011
Hemraj Vithalrao Tirpurkar
-vs-
Mah.State Road Transport Corporatin, Nagpur.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. R.S. Parsodkar, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. P.B. Patil, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH , JJ.
DATE : 18th September, 2012.
Heard. Perused the contents of the application. The proposed amendment does not change the nature of the petition. The prayer made in the amendment application is granted. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. The amendment should be carried out within a period of one week. Place the matter thereafter for admission.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
Hemraj Vithalrao Tirpurkar
Mah.State Road Transport Corporatin, Nagpur
Vasanti A. Naik
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
