This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5A. caw 23812.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 238 OF 2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3870 OF 2004
Mangesh Shantaram Sawant .. Applicant
Vs
Kulgaon Badlapur Nagar Parishad & Ors .. Respondents
Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for the Applicant
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the State
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Civil Application No. 238 of 2012 is moved by the applicant - original petitioner to serve some of the respondents mentioned in prayer clause (a) of the application by substituted service i.e paper publication since the said respondents could not be served by regular mode of service. In the circumstances, Civil Application is allowed.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]
1
5A. caw 23812.doc
2
Mangesh Shantaram Sawant
Kulgaon Badlapur Nagar Parishad
D. D. Sinha
Smt. V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
