Tipanna Sangappa Basawa and Ors. v. the State of Maharastr and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
1
wp815.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.815 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.U.R.Agandsurve for the petitioners. Mr.S.N.Patil, A.G.P. for resp. nos.1 & 2. Mr.I.M.Khairdi for resp. nos.4 & 5.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 01, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned counsel for the respective respondents.
nos.4 & 5 have already preferred an appeal under section 72 of the Bombay Public Trust Act against the order dated 28.1.2009 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Latur,
which is pending for decision. In these
sk
2
wp815.11
circumstances, we dispose of the Writ Petition by keeping the issues open. If the order is adverse to any of the parties, it will be open for them to challenge the same.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondents 1 & 2
Respondents 4 & 5
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court