A single judge civil application for the restoration of a pending writ petition was allowed after the sole respondent waived objection to the application, resulting in the writ petition being restored to the file.
Civil application allowed; Writ petition restored to file; Civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1094 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9903 OF 2010
Shankar Dadoba Naik. ..Applicant.. Versus Maharashtra Road Transport Corp. ..Respondent.
Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/b Mr. AshUtosh M. Kulkarni for the applicant. Ms. Pinki Bhansali i/b G.S.Hegde & Associates for respondent.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 27, 2012 .
P. C. :
1 of 3
patilsr
sole respondent was represented by the Advocate at the time of admission as well as today also, the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, civil application is allowed. Writ petition is restored to its file. Civil Application stands disposed of.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
2 of 3
patilsr
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9903 OF 2010
Shankar Dadoba Naik. Versus Maharashtra Road Transport Corp.
..Petitioner.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad i/b Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni for the petitioner.
Ms. Pinki Bhansali i/b G.S.Hegde & Associates for respondent.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 27, 2012 .
P. C. :
of notice for the respondent.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
3 of 3
patilsr
Shankar Dadoba Naik
Maharashtra Road Transport Corp.
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
