This writ petition directed the state to decide a revision application within four weeks and maintain status-quo on suit property. The single judge disposed of the writ petition by issuing this direction.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to decide revision within four weeks; status-quo on suit property maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.1709.2012
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1709 OF 2012
Jagannath Raghunath Walhekar & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. P.B.Gujar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. R.M.Patne, AGP for the respondents
CORAM : RANJIT MORE J. DATE : 25th APRIL, 2012.
P.C.
In my view, petition can conveniently be disposed of by passing following order.
-: O R D E R :-
[ RANJIT MORE, J ]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the respondent to decide a revision application within four weeks.
Whether status-quo should be maintained on suit property till revision disposal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAGANNATH RAGHUNATH WALHEKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RANJIT MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
