This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 6150.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6150 OF 2011 IN
CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 37933 OF 2010
IN
REJECTED CASE NO. 83 OF 2000
IN
CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 1027 OF 2000
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 19 OF 1990
Versus
1. Ganpati S/o Malba Limbotkar & anr. .. Respondents
Shri V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for Applicants. None for respondents.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH JUNE, 2012.
PER COURT :
. The copy is served on the counsel for respondents. The averments made in the civil application are not controverted by the respondents by filing any affidavit, so also the appeal
2 ca 6150.11
survives as far as the appellant No. 2 is concerned.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/June 12
Anand S/o Govind Limbotkar & others
Ganpati S/o Malba Limbotkar
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
