Second Appeal filed by original defendant against dismissal of suit for declaration and injunction. Court held that appeal did not involve substantial question of law as rights were crystallized by an earlier decree; appeal dismissed.
The Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 S.A. 606.2011
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO. 606 OF 2011
Kundlik S/o Satwaji Harale V/s Shaikh Lal S/o Shaikh Hyder & Ors.
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram,appearances, ................................ Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 11/06/2012.
Mr. V.M.Maney, Advocate for the Appellant.
PER COURT :
2 S.A. 606.2011
3 S.A. 606.2011
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/S.A. 606.2011
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal involves a substantial question of law regarding the binding nature of a compromise decree on non-parties.
Whether the trial court and District Court erred in not considering the limitation bar on the plaintiffs' earlier suit.
Kundlik
Shaikh Lal
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
