These civil applications filed in 1999 were disposed of because their purpose would not survive by the efflux of time.
The civil applications are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 1633.99
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1633 OF 1999
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 583 OF 1999
Kaluram S/o Umala Rathod .. Applicant
Versus
Moti S/o Pattu and others .. Respondents
Shri B. V. Dhage, Advocate for the Applicant.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3969 OF 1999
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 583 OF 1999
Kaluram S/o Umala Rathod .. Applicant
Versus
Moti S/o Pattu and others .. Respondents
Shri B. V. Dhage, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH JUNE, 2012.
2 ca 1633.99
PER COURT :
. These civil applications are filed in the year 1999. By efflux of time the purpose of said civil applications would not survive. Hence the civil applications are disposed of.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/June 12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether civil applications filed in 1999 can be maintained due to efflux of time.
Kaluram S/o Umala Rathod
Moti S/o Pattu and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
