This short order allows an application for condonation of delay in a review petition. The court rejects the review application due to no apparent error on the face of the record.
Condonation of delay in CA 2899/12 allowed. Review Application (St.) No. 6246/2012 rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 2899/12 in RA (St) 6246/12 in WP 8980/11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2899/2012 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (St.) NO.6246/2012 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8980/2011 Santosh Laxman Koli V/s The State & others.
_______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
Shri S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for applicant.
Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
Date: 20.03.2012
Heard learned counsel for the
respective parties.
Civil Application No.2899/2012 for condonation of delay is allowed and the delay is condoned.
With regard to Review Application (St.) No.6246/2012, no error apparent on the face of the record is noticed to warrant exercise of
CA 2899/12 in RA (St) 6246/12 in WP 8980/11
2
review jurisdiction. The review application is rejected.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 20.03.2012 ndk/c20312
Santosh Laxman Koli
The State
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
