Partly allowed

Ganesh Arun Khopde v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Oct 2012BA/1391/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge disposed of four bail applications filed by individuals allegedly involved in an assault due to local politics. One application was withdrawn. The remaining three were allowed, directing release on bail with a promise bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to Sagar Bhanudas Khopde, Ketan Netaji Khopde, and Chetan Netaji Khopde on furnishing a P.R. Bond of 25,000/- with sureties; Application No.1391 dismissed as withdrawn.

Ganesh Arun Khopde Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

sjs

¶2

BA-G-1391.2012

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
APPLICATION NO.1391 OF 2012

¶4

{For Bail}

¶5

Ganesh Arun Khopde.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶6

WITH

¶7

APPLICATION NO.1392 OF 2012 {For Bail}

¶8

Sagar Bhanudas Khopde.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶9

APPLICATION NO.1393 OF 2012
{For Bail}

¶10

Ketan Netaji Khopde.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶11

AND

¶12

APPLICATION NO.1394 OF 2012

¶13

{For Bail}

¶14

Chetan Netaji Khopde.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶15

Ms Kavita Pawar for the Applicants.
Ms U.V. Kejariwal, APP, for the State.

Page 1 of 3

sjs

BA-G-1391.2012

CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2012

¶20

P.C:

¶21

1.These are four applications for bail
by persons who have been arrested and charge-
sheeted for their alleged involvement in the
assault on one Ankush Ramchandra Khopde on
account of Gram Panchayat politics. The learned
counsel for the applicants states that the
investigation is complete and charge-sheet is
filed and the nature of the injuries sustained
by the victim Ankush do not show that there was
any murderous assault. She submits that offence
punishable under Section 307 of the IPC is not
at all made out. The learned APP, on the other
hand, points out that the victim had suffered
an incised wound over the scalp, apart from
fracture of clavicle and right patella on
account of an incised wound on the patella.
Therefore, according to the learned APP, the
injuries should be enough to show the intention
of the assailants. She also points out that in
the statement of Ankush he has specifically
stated about the complicity of all the
applicants but had attributed the injuries
sustained by him to the assault by Ganesh.

Page 2 of 3

sjs

BA-G-1391.2012

2.On being indicated that applicant
Ganesh would not be entitled to bail, the
learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the
application insofar as it relates to Ganesh.
Bail Application No.1391 of 2012 is dismissed
as withdrawn.

¶26

3. As far as the other applicants are concerned, since even according to the statement of Ankush they had not actually assaulted him, they be released on bail in C.R. No.43 of 2012 of Bhor Police Station, District Pune on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of 25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to 25,000/per applicant. The applications accordingly stand disposed of.

¶27

Page 3 of 3

Ganesh Arun Khopde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Arun Khopde v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manishkumar Agarwal and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Amol Alias Pappu Bhikaji Sonwane and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sunil Pandurang Salunkhe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mubarak @ Papya Khwaja Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dattatray Baburao Karpe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar Bhanudas Khopde Vs the State of Maharashtra