The applicant sought bail which was not granted. Counsel withdrew the application on being informed it was not maintainable in law. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA-1353.2012
sjs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
APPLICATION NO.1353 OF 2012
{For Bail}
Murtuza @ Munna Dawal Shaikh.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Shri K.S. Patil for the Applicant.
Shri Rajesh More, APP, for the State.
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED: OCTOBER 25, 2012
P.C:
On being indicated that the applicant
is not entitled to bail, the learned counsel
for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the
application. The application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Since the applicant is in jail since
January, 2010, that is more than two-years and
ten-months now, the learned trial Judge may fix
up a programme for the trial and take up the
case at the earliest possible and conclude it
as far as possible within a period of six
months.
Murtuza @ Munna Dawal Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court