The court held the criminal complaint compoundable and ended the proceedings as the first informant withdrew his report.
The criminal proceedings in C.C.No.131/PS/2009 are compound and disposed of due to withdrawal of the first informant's report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1217-10
rpa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1217 OF 2010
Manindersingh Ahluwalia & Anr. .. Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Hemang Jariwala i/b. Auroma Law for the Petitioners. Mr. Negendra Dube for the Intervenor. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATE : OCTOBER 23, 2012.
P.C.
The first informant has tendered an application stating that he
does not want to proceed with his report for the offence punishable under Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code given by him against the Petitioners. The first informant is identified by his advocate. The offence punishable under Section 341 is compoundable and, therefore, since the first informant himself does not wish to proceed further with his report, the offence which is being enquired into in C.C.No.131/PS/2009 in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 48th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai is compounded. The proceeding in the case come to an end as the offence is compounded. The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manindersingh Ahluwalia & Anr.
State of Maharashtra
R. C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
