The High Court at Bombay was convened on 24 September 2012 to hear Criminal Application No. 474 of 2012. The applicants deposited costs and produced a receipt, leading the court to instruct the registry to proceed.
The registry to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPW 474-12.odt
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.474 OF 2012 IN
Devendra Kumar Zialal Sukhchand.Applicants
Jaiswal & ors
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.Respondent
Ms Ashwini Gadgil h/f. Mr.A.M.Chimalkar,
Advocate, for the Applicants
Smt.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for the Respondent -
State
CORAM:R.C.CHAVAN, J.
DATE:24TH SEPTEMBER, 2012
P.C.
.Heard the learned counsel for the
respective parties.
2.The learned counsel for the applicants
states that costs have been deposited and she
would produce a receipt in the registry.
Registry to proceed.
Page 1 of 1
Devendra Kumar Zialal Sukhchand and ors.
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court