Chetan Kumar Sanghvi v. Aparna Chetan Sanghvi and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPW/183/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
sjs
¶2
APPW-183.2012
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
APPLICATION NO.183 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2684 OF 2010
¶4
Chetan Kumar Sanghvi.... Applicant
Vs.
Mrs. Aparna Chetan Sanghvi
& Anr..... Respondents
¶5
None for the Applicant.
Shri B.G. Tangsali, APP, for the State.
¶6
CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
¶7
DATED: SEPTEMBER 18, 2012
¶8
P.C:
¶9
None for the applicant.
¶10
If the applicant fails to remove the
office objections within two weeks, the
application to stand dismissed for want of
prosecution, without further reference to
Court. If the needful is done within two weeks,
issue notice to respondent No.1, returnable
four weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Chetan Kumar Sanghvi
- respondent
Mrs. Aparna Chetan Sanghvi
Coram
AI extract
R.C. Chavan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court