The Court allowed the petitioner's application to amend Criminal Writ Petition No. 156 of 2012, finding no prejudice to respondents, and directed the petition be listed for hearing.
Amendments to the Criminal Writ Petition including one paragraph and two prayers were permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application No.42 of 2012 IN
Criminal Writ Petition No. 156 of 2012
[Mohd. Jamil Ab. Jalil Vs. State of Mah. & another]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. P.K. Sathianathan, Adv., for the petitioner
Mrs. T.D. Khade, APP for respondents.
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 11th April, 2012.
01.The petitioner herein wants to amend Criminal
Writ Petition No. 156 of 2012. He wants to add one
paragraph and two prayers.
02. The petition is yet to be admitted.
03. Heard.
04.We find that the amendment would not lead to any
prejudice to the respondents, and can be granted.
05. Application is allowed.
06.Learned Adv. Mr. Sathianathan states that he
2
would carry out the amendment within three days.
Amendment be carried out accordingly.
07.List the petition for hearing on 17th April,
2012.
JudgeJudge
|Hedau|
Mohd. Jamil Ab. Jalil
State of Mah.
A.H. Joshi
Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court