Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/O Sewaram Rana v. State of Mah. Thr. Police Station Officer

Bombay HC16 Oct 2012APPP/1078/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment lists multiple criminal applications where the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed requests to dispense with the filing of translations or certified copies and permitted a party to join the original complainant as a respondent.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to dispense with filing of translation and certified copy; leave granted to join original complainant as respondent.

Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/O Sewaram Rana Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

APL1047.2012

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Criminal Application (APPP) No. 1047 of 2012

¶5

Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/Sewaram Rana

¶6

vs.

¶7

State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Gadgenagar, Distt. Amravati

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶9

Court’s or Judge’s orders

¶10

Shri T. D. Mandlekar, Counsel for applicant Shri A. S. Sonare, APP for respondent

¶11

CORAM : P. V. HARDAS &

¶12

A. P. BHANGALE, JJ.

¶13

DATED : OCTOBER 16, 2012.

¶14

By this application, the applicant seeks leave of this Court to dispense with the filing of the translation of a letter, which is filed by the applicant at Annexure - ‘K’ (Page No. 57).

¶15

We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor and for the reasons stated in the application, we allow this application and grant the leave as prayed for.

¶16

Criminal Application (APPP) No. 1078 of 2012

¶17

By this application, the applicant seeks leave of this Court for dispensing with the filing of the certified copy of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Amravati, dated 3^rd August, 2012.

¶18

APL1047.2012

¶19

¶20

It appears that the petitioner has filed a true copy of the said order at Annexure - ‘I’. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated therein, we allow this application and dispense with the filing of the certified copy of aforesaid order.

¶21

Criminal Application (APPP) No. 1104 of 2012

¶22

By this application, the applicant seeks leave to join the original complainant as a respondent to this application.

¶23

We accordingly allow this application and permit the applicant to join the original complainant Mr Rajneesh Kedia as a respondent to this application. Amendment be carried out within one week from today.

¶24

JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

Punde

Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/O Sewaram Rana v. State of Mah. Thr. Police Station Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/O Sewaram Rana v. State of Mah. Thr. Police Station Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bishambar S/O Janakram Gangboir Vs State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Kalamna, Nagpur

Shyam S/O Vishwanath Rodge Vs Dig Prisons(East) Nagpur and Another

Girdhari Mahaveerprasad Kaithwas, C/1929, Central Prison Amravati,through Her Wife Kanta G Kaithwas Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secy, Home Department Mantralaya,Mumbai and Another

Ramendar Rana, Boby Rana S/O Sewaram Rana Vs State of Mah. Thr. Police Station Officer

Mr Kshitij S/O Uday Kumar Dongare Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Pso Nagpur

Ku. Ranjana S/O Wamanrao Dange Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Its Secty. and 2 Ors.