Allowed
Sayyed Irfan Sayyed Amir Ali v. Shivcharan Kanhaiyyalal Dhandhore and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/900/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No. 900 of 2012
(Sayyed Irfan Sayyed Amir Ali v. Shivcharan Dhandhore & Anr.)
OfficeN |
otes, |
Office |
Court's or Judge's orders |
|---|---|---|---|
Memoranda |
of |
Coram, |
|
appearancesorders or |
,directi |
Court'sons and |
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. |
Registrar's |
orders |
Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Adv for respondent
No.1
Mr. R.P. Phatke, APP for the respondent No.
2/ State
For the reasons mentioned it, this
application is allowed.
( A. H. JOSHI, J. )
Date : 20/03/2012
SRM/
Sayyed Irfan Sayyed Amir Ali
Shivcharan Dhandhore
State
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court