The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad allowed the withdrawal of Criminal Application No. 890 of 2012. The application was dismissed accordingly. No substantive legal principle was established as the matter was withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the criminal application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.890 of 2012
(Ramkrishna Abhiman Patil v. The State)
OfficeN |
otes, |
Office |
Court's or Judge's orders |
|---|---|---|---|
Memoranda |
of |
Coram, |
|
appearancesorders or |
,directi |
Court'sons and |
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. |
Registrar's |
orders |
Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for the
respondent / State
1.The learned Advocate appearing for the
applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the
application. This application is allowed to
be withdrawn and dismissed accordingly.
2.In the event if the application for
early hearing is moved by the applicant
before the learned Sessions Court, the
learned Sessions Court may decide the same
considering that the applicant is in jail.
Date : 20/03/2012
SRM/
Ramkrishna Abhiman Patil
The State
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court