Milind Ramesh Yennam v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application disposed as withdrawn after applicant informed the court that he would surrender on 26 March 2012 following the filing of the charge sheet.
Application disposed as withdrawn after applicant informed the court that he would surrender on 26 March 2012 following the filing of the charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2012
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|
| Mr.S.S.Jadhav h/f. Mr.S.J.Salare, learned advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.R.Kale, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State. |
|
| CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATE : 19/03/2012 |
|
| 1. In the midst of hearing, learned advocate for the applicant states that in view of filing of charge sheet, the applicant will surrender and apply for bail. |
|
| 2. He states that he would surrender on 26 thMarch 2012. Interim order shall continue till then. |
|
| 3. Application is disposed as withdrawn. | |
| (A.H.JOSHI, J.) khs/March 2012/194-12 |
applicant
state
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court