In a criminal application for bail cancellation, the High Court rejected the State's challenge against bail granted by the Sessions Judge. The Court held that the bail order was passed on merits and found not to be erroneous.
Application for cancellation of bail rejected; bail to respondents stands confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran662.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 662 OF 2012
The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant
VERSUS 1. Shaharukh s/o Hamid Khan 2 Abu Bakar s/o Jabbar Khan ...Respondents
Shri D.R. Kale, A.P.P. for applicant-State Shri D.S. Manorkar h/f Mr. S.G. Ladda, advocate for respondents
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATED : 26TH MARCH, 2012.
PER COURT :-
cran662.12
2
Asmat Khan. These injured have suffered minor injuries and were not even admitted in the Hospital.
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should cancel bail granted by the Sessions Judge for the respondents involved in an assault case where witnesses suffered minor injuries.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Maharashtra
Shaharukh s/o Hamid Khan
Abu Bakar s/o Jabbar Khan
A.H. Joshi, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court