In a criminal bail application, the High Court allowed temporary bail for an applicant due to an imminent family wedding and regular bail for another accused involved in the assault-based case.
Applicant No. 2 granted temporary bail for 8 days; Applicant No. 4 granted regular bail on surety bond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran1095.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1095 OF 2012
...Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Shri Sandeep S. Deshmukh advocate for the applicants Shri S.B. Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 26TH MARCH, 2012
PER COURT :-
to the extent of applicant No.2 Tajoddin s/o Ansuddin Shaikh, for a period of eight days, on the ground that the daughter of applicant No.2 is to be married on 29th March, 2012.
cran1095.12
2
10. Humdast allowed.
11. Application is disposed of.
rlj/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail on the grounds stated.
Whether temporary bail is admissible for the applicant whose daughter's marriage is scheduled.
Ansuddin Babamiya Shaikh
Tajoddin s/o Ansuddin Shaikh
Rajjak s/o Ansuddin Shaikh
Faimun w/o Rajoddin Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court