Nitin Vitthal Suryawanshi v. the State of Mah and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1249 OF 2012
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|
| Mr.B.N.Patil, learned advocate for the applicant. Mr.R.P.Phatke, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State. |
|
| CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATE : 22/03/2012 |
|
| 1. Heard. | |
| 2. This is an application for bail after filing of charge sheet. |
|
| 3. This Court finds no propriety to entertain this application after filing of charge sheet. |
|
| 4. Application is rejected. | |
| (A.H.JOSHI, J.) khs/March 2012/1249-12 |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail application filed post-charge sheet can be entertained by this Court.
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail after the filing of the charge sheet.
Unknown Applicant
State
A.H.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court