Single-judge application for cancellation of bail. Advocate absent. Court observed bail cannot be cancelled merely due to dissatisfaction and rejected the application.
Application for cancellation of bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap5236.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5236 OF 2011
Chandrakant s/o Vishwanath Darade...Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors....Respondents
.....
Shri D.R.Adhav, advocate for the applicant
Shri P.N.Mule, A.P.P. for respondent no.1
Shri S.G.Jadhavar, advocate for respondent nos. 2, 4
and 5
Respondent nos. 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 served.
CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.
DATED : 21.03.2012.
PER COURT:-
1. Advocate for the applicant is absent.
2. Perused the record.
3. This is an application for cancellation of bail.
4. The request for cancellation of bail cannot be considered merely because somebody is not satisfied.
2crap5236.11
5. In the result, application does not deserve any
indulgence and is rejected.
dbm/crap5236.11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for cancellation of bail deserves indulgence.
Chandrakant s/o Vishwanath Darade
The State of Maharashtra
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court