In this oral judgment, the single judge allowed the criminal appeal where the connected appeal in the same crime was permitted, setting aside the conviction and acquitting the absent appellant.
Judgment of conviction set aside; appellant acquitted; warrant cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Cri.Appeal No.24/1998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24 OF 1998
Rajesh @ Munna Jawahar Varma, Age-28 years, Occu-Shop Owner, R/o.Akola, Dist. Akola APPELLANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Ram S/o.Dnyanoba Chewale, Age-Major, Occu-Service, R/o.Hingoli, Tq.Hingoli RESPONDENT
Warrant executed against the appellant is received unexecuted. Mr.D.R.Kale, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State.
(CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J.)
DATE : 21/03/2012
ORAL JUDGMENT :
2
Cri.Appeal No.24/1998
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
khs/MARCH 2012/24-98
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present criminal appeal ought to be allowed in view of the connected appeal being allowed.
Rajesh @ Munna Jawahar Varma
State of Maharashtra
A.H. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
