Allowed
Balasaheb Nana Torne v. Dnyandeo Ananda Jadhav and Ors.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1324/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1324 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1129 OF 2012
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1325 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.934 OF 2012
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s Orders |
|---|---|
| Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, learned advocate for the applicant. Mr.R.P.Phatke, learned A.P.P. for respondent/State. Mr.Joydeep Chatterji, learned advocate for respondent no.1 and 2 in Cri.Appl.No.1324/2012 Mr.S.S.Shete, learned advocate for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appl.No.1325/2012. |
|
| CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATE : 19/03/2012 |
|
| 1. Heard. | |
| 2. Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. |
|
| (A.H.JOSHI, J.) khs/March 2012/1324-12 |
Applicant in Cri.Appl.No.1324/2012
State
Respondent no.1 in Cri.Appl.No.1324/2012
Respondent no.2 in Cri.Appl.No.1324/2012
Applicant in Cri.Appl.No.1325/2012
A.H.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court