Allowed

Chetan Pralhad Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Jul 2012APPA/883/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Bombay disposed of bail applications by convicted appellants facing life imprisonment under Section 395 IPC. The court granted bail pending appeal to four prisoners on furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the applicants on furnishing a personal bond of 50,000/each with sureties aggregating to 50,000/- per applicant.

Chetan Pralhad Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

sjs

¶2

APPA-G-874.2012

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL

¶4

APPLICATION NO.874 OF 2012 IN

¶5

APPEAL NO.577 OF 2012

¶6

1. Rekha Vinod Dhavare @
 Rekha Prakash Belle
2. Vinod Bharat Dhavare.... Applicants
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶7

WITH

¶8

APPLICATION NO.883 OF 2012 IN

¶9

APPEAL NO.590 OF 2012

¶10

Chetan Pralhad Gaikwad.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶11

AND

¶12

APPLICATION NO.885 OF 2012 IN

¶13

APPEAL NO.591 OF 2012

¶14

Smt. Sujata Rajendra Babare.... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent

¶15

Shri V.V. Purwant for the Applicants
in APPA-874 & 883 of 2012.
Shri Prasad Kulkarni for the Applicant
in APPA-885/2012.

¶16

sjs

¶17

APPA-G-874.2012

¶18

Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP, for the State
in APPA-874/2012.
Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State in
APPA-883/2012.
Ms V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP, for the State
in APPA-885/2012.

¶19

CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J.
DATED: JULY 24, 2012

¶20

P.C:

¶21

These are applications for bail by the
applicants/appellants who have been convicted
by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Solapur for the offence punishable under
Section 395 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer
rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine.
Appellants, Rekha, Vinod and Sujata were on
bail throughout the trial. Appellant Chetan
Gaikwad was in jail since his arrest on
17-3-2010. Considering the nature of the
evidence against the applicants, namely that
they were identified by the victim after their
arrest in the police station first, then at the
test identification parade and then in the
Court, and also considering the nature of the
sentence imposed and the fact that the appeals
would take some time for hearing, the
applicants be released on bail on their

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

sjs APPA-G-874.2012

¶24

furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of 50,000/each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to 50,000/- per applicant. The applications accordingly stand disposed of.

¶25

Page 3 of 3

Chetan Pralhad Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetan Pralhad Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Digambar Mahadeo Raut Vs Udaysingh Prataprao Chavan and Ors.

Badrinarayan Madanlal Dangra Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Peejay Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pooja Advertisement Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Rakha Vinod Dhavare @ Rekha Prakash Belle and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sujata Rajendra Babare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sakil Azim Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.