The single-judge Bench rejected an application seeking transfer of a sessions case from the Adhoc Sessions Judge to the Additional District Judge, deeming the request beyond comprehension.
Application for transfer of the sessions case from one judge to another is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vrd 1 APL178/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.178 OF 2012
Mr Ramchandra S. Bandivadekar and anr.
...Applicants
v/s
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
...Respondents
Mr Pawan Mali i/b Mr Prakash Naik for Applicants. Mrs S.V. Sonawane, APP for State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL J.
DATED : 27TH NOVEMBER 2012.
P.C. :-
case from the learned Adhoc Sessions Judge to Additional District Judge as they feel the issues
being serious, the present incumbent may not be in a position to handle the same. Application is beyond comprehension. Hence rejected.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal application for transfer of a case from one judge to another should be allowed when the applicants feel the present incumbent may not be capable of handling the serious issues.
Mr Ramchandra S. Bandivadekar and anr.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
