Ishtiyaq Ahmd, Baitulla Khan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by a property purchaser. The court found no warrant for the payment made and held that no case for anticipatory bail was made out.
What the court decided
1ABA 379-12.odt
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.379 OF 2012
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.242 OF 2012
Ishtiyaq Ahmd. Baitulla Khan.Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.Respondent
Mr.M.S.Mohite with Mr.Dilip Shukla i/b. SBG AND
ASSOCIATES, Advocate, for the Applicant
Ms V.S.Mhaispurkar, APP, for the Respondent –
State
Mr.Uday Warunjikar, Advocate, for the Intervener
CORAM:R.C.CHAVAN, J.
DATE:5TH JULY, 2012
P.C.
.Heard the learned counsel for the
respective parties.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable in a case where the applicant purchased disputed property and the complainant alleged lack of payment to the right holder.
Whether the applicant is a victim regarding the payment of funds to a Power of Attorney holder.
Whether any prima facie case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ishtiyaq Ahmd. Baitulla Khan
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- intervenor
Uday Warunjikar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court