The court disposed of this writ petition by directing Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's complaint dated 31.05.2011 expeditiously and within six weeks.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's complaint of 31.05.2011 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
drp
W.P.No.9722/2011
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION.9722 OF 2011
Trimbak Sayaji Turukmane
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.S.B.Ghatol Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.G.Nandedkar, AGP for respondent State
[CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.]
DATE : 17th December 2011
PER COURT:
[A.V.POTDAR, J.] [B.R.GAVAI, J.]
drp/B11/wp9722-11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the respondent authority to decide a complaint filed by the petitioner within a specified time limit.
Trimbak Sayaji Turukmane
The State of Maharashtra
Others
B.R. Gavai
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
