Disposed
Rekhabai Kundlikrao Turukmare v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/9718/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
WRIT PETITION NO. 9718 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's Orders
Mr. S.T. Veer, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 11.01.2012
P.C.:-
1. Heard. Motion seeking correction in the order dated 17.12.2011 is allowed. The word " Tribe " appearing in the order be replaced by the word " Caste ". Necessary correction be carried out.
Sd/Sd/-
arp
[M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the motion seeking correction in the impugned order to replace the word 'Tribe' with 'Caste'.
Petitioner
Respondent-State
B. R. GAVAI
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court