This writ petition challenged the rejection of objections regarding reservation policy. The bench upheld the Divisional Commissioner's findings, noting sound reasons and a need for flexibility, leading to the rejection of the petitioner's case.
The petition stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
drp
W.P.No.9712/2011
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION. 9712 OF 2011
Santosh Daulatrao Bodade
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocate for petitioner Mr.V.D.Godbharale, AGP for respondent State Mr.U.S.Malte, Advocate for respondent No.1
[CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, AND
A.V.POTDAR, J.J.]
DATE : 17th December 2011
PER COURT:
[A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B11/wp9712-11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Divisional Commissioner's reasoning for rejecting the petitioner's objections regarding reservation policy warrants interference.
Santosh Daulatrao Bodade
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
