Writ petition miscellaneous order where the High Court accepted theundertaking from the AGP that the petitioner's representation would bedecided within twelve weeks and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The High Court accepted the AGP's undertaking and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-9350-11.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9350 OF 2011
Shri Borse Bhanudas Ramdas vs
Dang Seva Mandal, Nashik, through President/Secretary and ors.
.... Petitioner
.... Respondents
Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the petitioner. Mr. Neel G. Helekar for respondents 1 and 2. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, AGP for responents 4 and 5.
CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : December 13, 2011
P.C.:
The learned AGP appearing for the Respondent/State states that
the representation of the Petitioner, copy of which is at Exhibit “C” to the Petition, will be decided in accordance with law and decision thereof will be communicated to the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of twelve weeks from today.
The statement is accepted. The Petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)
Shri Borse Bhanudas Ramdas
Dang Seva Mandal, Nashik
D. K. Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
