In a writ petition, the Petitioner filed before the High Court at Bombay was permitted to be withdrawn upon the recordal of a notice issued by Respondent No.1 (Mumbai University) and was disposed of accordingly.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-3753-11.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3753 OF 2011
The Sanjeevan Gramin Vaidyakiya Samajik Sahayata Pratishthan
.... Petitioner
vs
The Mumbai University and ors. .... Respondents
Mr. Milind Parab for the petitioner.
Mr. Rui A. Rodrigues for respondent no.1.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondents 2 and 3.
Mr.Sariputta Sarnath /by Mr. Mihir Desai for respondent no.4.
CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : December 13, 2011
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1-University places on record copy of notice dated 7 December 2011, which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In view of notice
issued by the University, copy of which is at “X”, the Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty and disposed of as such.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D. K. DESHMUKH,J.)
The Sanjeevan Gramin Vaidyakiya Samajik Sahayata Pratishthan
The Mumbai University
D. K. Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
