Petitioner sought similar relief as in adjoining writ petition regarding stone crushing machinery. Court noted petitioner complied with requirements and nothing survives in the writ petition, disposing accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as nothing survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9291 OF 2010
M/s.Saikrupa Stone Crusher
.. Petitioner
V/s
The Tahasildar, Tal.Dindori, Dist Nashik & Ors.
.. Respondents
Ms.P.U.Badadare, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs.M.P.Thakur, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2011
P.C. :
Writ Petition No.9292 of 2010 on 7th December, 2010 be passed in this petition. Accordingly, the following order.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
M/s.Saikrupa Stone Crusher
The Tahasildar, Tal.Dindori, Dist Nashik
V.C.Daga
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
