The High Court of Bombay made a rule absolute in a writ petition concerning land acquisition. Relying on a prior judgment, the court noted the State admitted it had not taken physical possession of the land, satisfying the petitions requests.
Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1: 7780.10-wp
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7780 OF 2010
Shankar Gajanan Bhoir ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar for petitioner.
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ.
DATE :- JANUARY 13, 2011
P.C.
Heard.
Perused petition.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
whether the writ petition regarding land acquisition should be dismissed or allowed given the State's admission of non-possession.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Voltas Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Ors.Followed¶13
Voltas Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Ors. 2008(5) Bom.C.R.746 · Who else cites this
Shankar Gajanan Bhoir
State of Maharashtra
V.C.Daga
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
