Disposed
Adhyaatmam Bhamini v. Jagdish Ambalal Shah
Bombay HCCAM/4/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1: 04.11-caf
bgp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2011 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.62 OF 2010
Ms.Adhyaatmam Bhamini Damodar Park Bldg ..Applicant Vs. Jagdish A.Shah ..Respondent
Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for applicant.
Ms.Nalini Chagla for respondent.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ. DATE :- JANUARY 13, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused application.
Hearing of the appeal is expedited. So far as the application for leading additional evidence is concerned, that is to be considered at the time of final hearing. Liberty to move after six months. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(R.G.KETKAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
Adhyaatmam Bhamini
Jagdish A. Shah
V.C. Daga
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court