The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition which was withdrawn by the counsel appearing for the petitioners on their request. The rule was discharged.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-7774-08.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7774 OF 2008
Raj Devendra Construction Pvt. Ltd. and ors. .... Petitioners vs
The Ratnakar Bank Ltd. and ors.
.... Respondents
Mr. Abhijeet Desai i/by Mr. Santosh B. NarwadePatil for the petitioners.
Mrs. Gurvi Bhagwat i/by M/s. Divekar & Co. for respondent No.1.
CORAM: DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : June 23, 2011
P.C.:
On the request of the counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Rule is accordingly discharged. No order as to costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.D. Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
Raj Devendra Construction Pvt. Ltd.
The Ratnakar Bank Ltd.
D.Y. Chandrachud
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
