The Bombay High Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition to enable the petitioner to raise contentions in the Sales Tax Tribunal, pursuant to an order in a companion case.
Withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 3364 of 2011 permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PNP 1
WP3364-24.6.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3364 OF 2011
M/s.Vamsi Labs Limited
..Petitioner.
versus
The Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal and others
..Respondents.
.....
Mr. C.B. Thakkar with Mr. M.M. Vaidya for the Petitioner. Mr. V.A. Sonpal, A Panel counsel for Respondents 2 and 3.
......
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
24 June 2011.
P.C. :
In view of the order that has been passed by the Court today in companion Writ Petition 10340 of 2010, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition so as to raise all appropriate contentions before the Tribunal as provided for in the order of the Court. The Petition is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(Anoop V. Mohta J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
None
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Vamsi Labs Limited
The Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal
D.Y. Chandrachud
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
