Disposed
Kirtanlal International Dmcc v. M/S Ismt Ltd.
Bombay HCCAW/826/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PNP 1
CAW826-20.6.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.826 OF 2011
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.61 OF 2011
ISMT Limited ..Petitioner. versus The Union of India and another ..Respondents. and Kirtanlal International DMCC ..Applicant.
.....
Mr. Vikram Nankani with Mr. Nitya Bagadia i/b Mr. Madhur R. Baya for the Petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the Respondents.
Mr. Prakash Shah with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for the Applicant.
......
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
20 June 2011.
P.C. :
The Applicant has sought intervention in these proceedings on the ground that it was heard by the designated authority. Since the request is only for intervention in these proceedings, we permit the Applicant to intervene as sought. The Civil Application is disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
(Anoop V. Mohta J.)
ISMT Limited
The Union of India
Kirtanlal International DMCC
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court