The High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, dismissed Writ Petition No.7120 of 2009 as infructuous based on the petitioners' counsel's statement that the petition had become null and void without engaging with substantive arguments.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP No.7120 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.7120 of 2009
Vishwanath s/o Raghunath Dubukwad And Another.
.. Petitioners.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioners. Shri. T.S. Lodhe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Shri. J.R. Patil, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 14th DECEMBER 2011
PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
Vishwanath s/o Raghunath Dubukwad and Another
The State of Maharashtra and Others
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
