Three writ petitions were admitted where the learned counsel for the petitioners sought withdrawal on instructions as the issue was settled. The court did not address merits and granted leave to withdraw.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1976-10.odt
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders |
WRIT PETITION NOS.1976, 5923 & 5924 of 2010.
Shri Pramod Gaikwad h/f Shri
A.G.Talhar,Adv.for petrs.
Shri V.G.Ghatge,AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL &
T.V.NALAWADE,JJ.
DATE : 13/12/2011.
1]ShriPramodGaikwad,
learned counsel has placed on
record three communications
dated 10/12/2011 addressed to
S/Shri A.G.Talhar and Nilesh
Desle, counsels, which are
taken on record and marked as
"X" for identification. The
learnedcounselfor
petitioners, on instructions
seeks withdrawal of these
2 wp1976-10.odt petitions, as according to learned counsel, the issue has been settled between the parties. Without addressing on the merits of the matter,leave is granted to withdraw the Writ petitions Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
2]In view of dismissal of
WritPetitions,Civil
Applications are disposed of.
(T.V.NALAWADE,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.)
umg/wp1976-10
Petitioner(s)
State
NARESH H.PATIL
T.V.NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court