challenge the directions given by the Sugar Commissioner. A copy of judgment delivered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5240/2010 is produced in this regard. This proceeding was filed by Devrajan Laxman Sugars Limited, Tahsil Udgir, District Latur. The application of this applicant was given Serial No. 41 in the aforesaid priority list. This applicant had also contended that letter dated 20.6.2010 was not received and it was represented before the Sugar Commissioner that other claimant was influential person and the other claimant was likely to get orders due to political pressure. This applicant did not attend the meeting dated 30.4.2010. In that case, the other claimant had submitted application for issuance of Aerial Distance Certificate on 9.12.2009, later in time, and in that case also the certificate was issued in favour of respondent No. 7 of that case. In that matter, this Court referred to the aforesaid order made in Writ petition No. 3222/2010 on 16.4.2010. This Court considered the facts of the case and held that the Sugar Commissioner was not justified in giving preferential treatment to the application of respondent No. 7 of that proceeding. It is observed that if Sugar Commissioner wanted to consider the application of respondent No. 7, in that case also the Sugar Commissioner could have considered the application of the petitioner, which was pending and the petitioner could have been asked to remove deficiencies or
