The High Court disposed of the writ petition stating there is no dispute as the union has accepted the government's undertaking to pay the salary difference arising from the employee's promotion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 4015.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4015 OF 2011
Sarvodaya Shikshan Prasarak Co-op Society Ltd. Umberkhede, Dist. Jalgaon through Chairman .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri P. R. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri Vinod S. Khairnar (Patil), Advocate for the Respondent No. 6.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011.
PER COURT :
. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 03.05.2011 passed by the Education Officer, whereby the Education Officer had reviewed its earlier order and had directed to calculate the salary of the respondent No. 6 as per the promotional order passed. Vide order dated 04th October, 2011, this Court had directed the petitioner to submit the proposal about payment pursuant to the impugned order to the Government/competent
2 wp 4015.11
authority who shall process the said proposal and take decision thereon within a period of six (6) weeks.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Dec. 11
Sarvodaya Shikshan Prasarak Co-op Society Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 6
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
