The High Court at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw her writ petition (WP No. 3238 of 2010). The petition, which remained unargued, was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 3238.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3238 OF 2010
Smt. Shahanoorbi Mohd. Shah .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Shri B. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri R. P. Phatake, Addl. G. P. for the Respondent/State. Shri S. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011.
PER COURT :
. Shri Deshmukh, the learned counsel on instructions of the petitioner who is present in the Court seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/Dec. 11
Smt. Shahanoorbi Mohd. Shah
The State of Maharashtra and another
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
