Bench of Dharmadhikari and Kode JJ disposed of a writ petition seeking appointment of the petitioner over an already appointed candidate, noting unexplained laches without granting costs, while reserving liberty to approach appropriate fora.
Petition disposed of; liberty granted to take further legal steps; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION NO. 3014 OF 2011
(Usha Kisanrao Khedkar vs. The Collector, Akola & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI &
P.D. KODE, JJ.
JULY 13, 2011.
Heard Shri Kurekar, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
On the basis of alleged entitlement in the year 2007, petition has been filed, seeking displacement of appointed candidate Respondent No. 4 and appointment for herself. The laches have not been properly explained.
With liberty to the petitioner to take such steps as are open to her in law, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for appointing the petitioner over an appointed candidate is maintainable despite unexplained laches.
Usha Kisanrao Khedkar
The Collector, Akola & Ors.
B.P. Dharmadhikari
P.D. Kode
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
