Petitioner withdrew a criminal writ petition seeking investigation into allegations. The petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies, disposing the matter on terms recorded by the Court.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-296-11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 296 OF 2011
Shri Sandeep Dnyandev Gawli ...Petitioner
Versus
Senior Police Inspector, Economic Offence Wing, & ors ...Respondents
Mr Vijay Chandavale, advocate for Petitioner.
Mr P.A. Pol, Public Prosecutor for the State.
P.I. Shri.Sulabha M. Patil, EOW present.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND
A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- 9th February, 2011.
P.C.
through counsel submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw
this petition with liberty to pursue other remedies in the light of order
passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 7th January, 2011. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Though the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition, we place on record assurance given by the newly appointed Investigating Officer Smt
S.M.Patil, Police Inspector, that as she has been appointed only
2 wp-296-11
yesterday, she would take all measures as may be necessary to unravel the truth in respect of the allegations made by the petitioner in the case
pending before the concerned Court.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Sandeep Dnyandev Gawli
Senior Police Inspector, Economic Offence Wing
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
