Allowed
Sanjay Arjun Pawar . v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/108/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa10811
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEALNO. 634 OF 1999
Sanjay Arjun Pawar ...Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Jagdish B. Choudhary i/by Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam for the Applicant Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
In view of the explanation offered in the application, in particular, that the applicant is in jail, and had no opportunity to know about the order passed by this Court dismissing his appeal, in the interest of justice, the application is allowed in terms of prayers clauses (aa) and (b). The restored appeal be listed for hearing in the week commencing from 14th February, 2011 under caption "Convicts in Jail".
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Sanjay Arjun Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court