The Court dismissed the applicant"s request for expedited hearing of the appeal, explaining that all convict appeals are listed chronologically. The Court also rejected the bail prayer as there were no changed circumstances warranting successive bail applications.
Application for expedited hearing and bail dismissed; case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appa11211
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1190 OF 2008
Jaywant Krishna Koli ...Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Ms. Bhakti Deshpande for the Applicant
Mr. H.J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
At the outset, the counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant would not press the prayer for bail, as the earlier application preferred by the applicant for bail came to be rejected on merits, and which order was confirmed even by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Learned counsel, however, submitted that the applicant would be more than content if the hearing of the appeal were to be expedited.
2 appa11211
3 appa11211
bail applications. Hence, this application is disposed of on the above
terms.
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail or expedited hearing of the appeal.
Whether rejection of bail application based on changed circumstances is maintainable.
Jaywant Krishna Koli
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
