This order disposes of a criminal writ petition and a related criminal application, noting that a 'B' Summary report has been filed on the petitioner's complaint, leaving no substantive matter for the High Court to consider. It explicitly states no opinion is formed on the allegations' correctness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.18 OF 2011
Sunil Rambriksh Rai ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.18 OF 2011
Mr.Mahesh Atma Vaswani ...Applicant Versus Sunil Rambriksh Rai & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Charanjeet Chanderpal on behalf of Petitioner present in Court.
Mr.Omprakash Jha for interveners.
Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 23, 2011.
P.C.
fact that the learned A.P.P. submits that on the basis of complaint made by
the petitioner, matter was investigated and `B’ Summary report has now
been filed before the concerned Court, nothing survives for consideration in
this Petition.
18.11
2
way about the correctness of the allegation made in the Petition.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Sunil Rambriksh Rai
The State of Maharashtra
Sunil Rambriksh Rai
A.M.KHANWILKAR
A.R.JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
